Head-to-head

Visible.vc vs Vestberry

Visible and Vestberry compared on collection, LP reporting, fund analytics and price.

Last updated

Short answer

Visible and Vestberry both collect portfolio data and report to LPs. Visible leads on LP reporting and a founder-side suite, and founders answer requests with no account. Vestberry leads on fund analytics: valuations, waterfalls, NAV, fees and benchmarks against 100+ peers, and it describes news and hiring signals. Pick Visible for LP reporting. Pick Vestberry for fund analytics.

Feature comparison: Visible.vc versus Vestberry
FeatureVisible.vcVestberry
Where the data comes fromFounder replies to requests, forwarded emails and files, integrationsThe AI Inbox parses what is forwarded to it (Premium and up).Investee portal, email requests, AI extraction and a data services team
What founders have to doAnswer a request or upload a file through a linkNo Visible account is needed.Submit KPIs through the portal or a requested email report
Public signal (news, LinkedIn, X, hiring)Not listed on their siteNews, hiring and competitor signals in its AI data model
Health scores and alertsThreshold metric alerts (Premium and up); no health score listedRisk signals for weak performance and missed targets; no score named
LP reportingYes, a core strengthTear sheets, dashboards, DDQ answers and LP letters.Yes, branded LP reports, tear sheets and an LP file portal
Fund accountingFund metrics (IRR, MOIC, TVPI); fund admin not listedTracks commitments, cash flows, NAV and fees; fund admin not listed
Peer benchmarkingBenchmarks inside your own portfolio (Premium and up)Yes, against 100+ peers
Reachable by your AI agentsAPI and MCP server on Premium and EnterpriseMCP server and APIs
SOC 2SOC 2 Type II, audited every yearSOC 2 not listed; ISO 27001 badge on the homepage

Facts verified from visible.vc/data-collection/, vestberry.com/data-collection, visible.vc/for-investors/, vestberry.com/blog/introducing-tony-vestberrys-ai-for-venture-capital, visible.vc/verification/, vestberry.com/portfolio-intelligence, visible.vc/reporting/, vestberry.com/reporting-audits, visible.vc/investor-pricing/, vestberry.com/single-source-of-truth, vestberry.com/blog/should-your-vc-fund-vibe-code-its-own-portfolio-monitoring-software-in-2026, visible.vc/security/, vestberry.com (checked 2026-10-28).

Pick Visible.vc if…

  • LP reporting is the main job.
  • Your founders already use Visible.
  • You want SOC 2 Type II today.

Pick Vestberry if…

  • You need valuations, waterfalls and scenario forecasts.
  • You want benchmarks against 100+ peer funds.
  • You have a finance or ops team to run it.

Pricing

Visible
Custom, by plan

Essential, Premium and Enterprise investor plans, each priced for your portfolio and team.

Vestberry
Not published

Pricing comes through a demo with sales.

Where Cura fits

Cura reads the emails, decks, Slack messages and calls founders already send, so founders do nothing new. It monitors LinkedIn, X, news and hiring for every company every day, and it starts at $200/month. Cura fits a lean team that wants collection to run on its own.

Cura vs Visible.vc · Cura vs Vestberry

Frequently asked questions

Prefer the wider view? See all comparisons.

Portfolio management without the busywork

See Cura running on your own portfolio.

Book a demo and we’ll load your portfolio into Cura. Reviews, KPIs and the signals you can’t afford to miss, all in one place.

Book a demo