Head-to-head

Standard Metrics vs Visible.vc

Standard Metrics and Visible compared on data collection, benchmarks, LP reporting and price.

Last updated

Short answer

Standard Metrics and Visible both collect portfolio data from founders and turn it into investor reports. Standard Metrics leads on benchmarks across 10,000+ startups and a managed data team. Visible leads on LP reporting and a founder-side suite many founders already use. Both have an API and an MCP server, and neither publishes investor pricing.

Feature comparison: Standard Metrics versus Visible.vc
FeatureStandard MetricsVisible.vc
Where the data comes fromData requests, QuickBooks or Xero sync, and AI-parsed documentsFirms can also forward data they receive outside the platform.Founder replies to requests, forwarded emails and files, integrationsThe AI Inbox parses what is forwarded to it (Premium and up).
What founders have to doAnswer each request or connect accountingA company account is optional.Answer a request or upload a file through a linkNo Visible account is needed.
Public signal (news, LinkedIn, X, hiring)On-demand web search in the AI AnalystScheduled monitoring is not listed on their site.Not listed on their site
Health scores and alertsBI alerts; no health score listedThreshold metric alerts (Premium and up); no health score listed
LP reportingYes, tear sheets and reports for LP updatesYes, a core strengthTear sheets, dashboards, DDQ answers and LP letters.
Fund accountingTracks investments by fund; fund admin not listedFund metrics (IRR, MOIC, TVPI); fund admin not listed
Peer benchmarkingYes, against 10,000+ anonymized startupsBenchmarks inside your own portfolio (Premium and up)
Reachable by your AI agentsREST API and hosted MCP server; MCP tools read dataThe REST API can also write metrics, notes and documents.API and MCP server on Premium and Enterprise
SOC 2SOC 2 Type II and GDPR compliantSOC 2 Type II, audited every year

Facts verified from standardmetrics.io/faq/, visible.vc/data-collection/, standardmetrics.io/ai-analyst/, visible.vc/for-investors/, standardmetrics.io/for-investors/, visible.vc/verification/, visible.vc/reporting/, visible.vc/investor-pricing/, standardmetrics.io/global-benchmarking/, docs.standardmetrics.io/guides/mcp-available-tools, standardmetrics.io/security/, visible.vc/security/ (checked 2026-10-28).

Pick Standard Metrics if…

  • You want to benchmark companies against 10,000+ anonymized startups.
  • You want a managed data team to check parsed financials.
  • Portfolio companies already connect QuickBooks or Xero.

Pick Visible.vc if…

  • LP reporting is the main job: tear sheets, DDQ answers and LP letters.
  • Your founders already use Visible for investor updates.
  • You want founders to answer requests through a link with no account.

Pricing

Standard Metrics
Quote-based

Investor pricing is not published, and it is not charged per seat. Free for portfolio companies.

Visible
Custom, by plan

Essential, Premium and Enterprise investor plans, each priced for your portfolio and team.

Where Cura fits

Neither tool lists scheduled public-signal monitoring. Cura reads the emails, decks, Slack messages and calls founders already send, so founders do nothing new. It monitors LinkedIn, X, news and hiring for every company every day, and it starts at $200/month.

Cura vs Standard Metrics · Cura vs Visible.vc

Frequently asked questions

Prefer the wider view? See all comparisons.

Portfolio management without the busywork

See Cura running on your own portfolio.

Book a demo and we’ll load your portfolio into Cura. Reviews, KPIs and the signals you can’t afford to miss, all in one place.

Book a demo