Comparison
Cura vs Edda
How Cura and Edda compare on deal flow, portfolio data, and monitoring.
Last updated
Short answer
Edda is a deal flow and portfolio management platform: pipelines, a CRM, portfolio tracking and an LP portal in one European-hosted tool. Its portfolio KPIs come from metric requests that founders fill in on Edda. Cura reads the emails, decks, Slack messages and calls founders already send, and it monitors public signal every day. Pick Edda for deal flow and portfolio in one system. Pick Cura for automatic portfolio monitoring.
Edda, formerly Kushim, is a Paris-based platform that covers the investment workflow from sourcing to exit. It has four modules: Dealflow, Portfolio Management, CRM and an LP Portal, plus an AI suite and an MCP server. Portfolio KPIs come mainly from metric requests that founders fill in on the platform. Cura focuses on the portfolio: it reads what founders already send over email, Slack and calls, and it adds public signal every day.
| Feature | Cura | Edda |
|---|---|---|
| Where the data comes from | Founder emails, decks, Slack, Granola calls and texts, read automaticallyPlus public sources, pulled every day. | Metric requests filled in by founders, plus data enrichment |
| What founders have to do | Nothing newCura reads what founders already send. Requests go out from your own inbox. | Log in to Edda and fill in the requested metrics |
| Public signal (news, LinkedIn, X, hiring) | Yes, monitored every dayLinkedIn, X, news and open roles across the portfolio. | A curated news feed; LinkedIn and hiring not listed |
| Health scores and alerts | Yes, momentum and health scores | Alerts on underperforming companies; no health score listed |
| LP reporting | Yes, built from the collected data | LP reports and an LP Portal (Pro plan and up) |
| Fund accounting | No; tracks funds and investments, not the books | No; Edda says it is not fund admin or accounting |
| Peer benchmarking | No | Mentions industry benchmarks; source not stated |
| Reachable by your AI agents | REST API and MCP server; agents read and writeRecord a metric, create a task or update a company from Claude or ChatGPT. | Open API and MCP server |
| SOC 2 | In progressRuns on SOC 2 Type II providers; certification underway. | SOC 2 (type not stated) and ISO 27001 |
Facts verified from help.edda.co/request-metrics-updates, edda.co/integration-newsfeed, edda.co/portfolio, edda.co/portal, edda.co/, edda.co/mcp, edda.co/trust-center (checked 2026-10-28).
Where Edda leads today
- Deal flow and portfolio in one system: a deal marked Invested moves into Portfolio with its data. Cura is not a deal-flow CRM.
- A contacts CRM with relationship intelligence and enrichment from Dealroom, Crunchbase and PitchBook.
- An MCP server that works with Claude, ChatGPT, Gemini and Copilot.
- SOC 2, ISO 27001 and EU hosting, with US, EU and APAC data residency options.
Why funds choose Cura over Edda
- Cura reads the updates founders already send. Edda asks founders to log in and fill in metric requests.
- Cura monitors LinkedIn, X, news and open roles every day. Edda offers a curated news feed.
- Cura scores the momentum and health of every company.
- Cura publishes its price: from $200/month. Edda shows plans but no prices.
Pricing
The Emerging Manager plan: up to 20 portfolio companies and 3 seats. Larger firms use the Custom plan, and 90% of customers pay $5,000–$15,000 a year.
First-Time GP, Premium, Pro and Enterprise plans, each with a Get pricing button.
Frequently asked questions
Prefer the wider view? See all Cura comparisons.
Portfolio management without the busywork
See Cura running on your own portfolio.
Book a demo and we’ll load your portfolio into Cura. Reviews, KPIs and the signals you can’t afford to miss, all in one place.
Book a demo